Site icon Making Studio

Tracker Teardowns

In 2024, we are constantly being tracked. What we buy, what we watch, where we go, who we talk to, what we say, what we listen to, where we travel, and what we Google; none of it is private. We sign up for all of this by carrying smartphones and logging into accounts when we make purchases. Why don’t we care about our privacy? I find this perplexing.

Today, I’m taking a look inside two tracking devices from our recent past:

  1. The Nike+iPod activity tracker, circa 2006; and
  2. an Object-tracking device, by an unknown manufacturer.

Before 👆

After 👇


  1. Nike+iPod Activity Tracker

Tools used in this teardown:

I started with the Nike+iPod Nano activity tracker. Designed to fit into a special Nike+ sneaker insole, the device worked with an app on the iPod Nano which tracked speed, distance covered, calories burned, and provided a voice-over personal trainer experience for runners.

I tried to split the device open with a flat head screwdriver, then a push pin, then a smaller pin. No cigar. I did some searching and found this video suggesting a way to open the device, and bizarrely enough, I had a jewelry saw on hand, and so tried to use that to crack through the outer layer. It did not work. Then I found another video and tried a few different exacto blades as suggested, but wanted to avoid a trip to the ER so I found a very thin flat head screw driver and decided brute force was the only way: I stuck the device in plasticine to hold it firmly to the table, and then I jammed a flat head down into it and smashed on it with a hammer. That finally worked!

Here are all the tools I tried to use 😅:

Here’s what actually worked:


So, what’s inside the Nike+iPod Nano tracker?

In addition to the pieces listed below, there were many rubbery adhesive strips used to keep everything in place.

ComponentManufacturer and NumberMaterialPurpose
Outer shellhard plastic, high reflectivityencase the product
Reset Button (outer)soft, flexible siliconeencase the reset switch
Reset button (inner)hard plastic and metaltrigger the reset
Circuit boardmetal
BatteryPanasonic CR 2032 3Vpower source
Wireless TransmitterNordic Semiconductorultra-low-power wireless transmitter (talks to the iPod)
Micro chipPIC16F688mini computer
AntennaAntenova A10192hard plastic, metalconverts current into radio waves

For this device, the design choice that interested me most was the fact that it was so hard to open this sensor. There’s no way to recharge the battery, or replace it. You wont be surprised to learn that these were meant to be tossed out after the battery died, and replaced with a new one. At $29 a pop, with a 1000 mile battery life (approximately 1 year per Nike and Apple) the price for the tracker is reasonable. Considering that you can get a 5 pack of the Panasonic 3V batteries for $3.29, I wonder what the additional cost would be to make a tracker where the battery replaceable. Would more plastic required? Would a larger insole be needed?

The Nike+iPod product evolved along with Apple products, but this specific form-factor has been retired.


2. Moving on to to “Tile” Type Device

Tools used in this teardown:

This device is fairly simple as well, and only had a few parts:

Here’s what makes up the “Tile-type” tracker:

ComponentManufacturer and NumberMaterialPurpose
Outer shell/caseHard plastic, low reflectivity, paintedencase the product
Battery capHard plastic, low reflectivity, paintedallow battery replacement
Light cap?hard, clear, frostedI didnt’ find an LED so I’m not sure what this is for!!
“D” Ringhard plasticused to attach object
BatteryPanasonic CR 2032 3Vpower source
System-on-ChipTexas Instruments CC2541micro-controller
Circuit boardFP E204460 / M11 94V-0
Date stickerset for 8/2014identify approximate date of manufacture
AntennaAntenova A10192converts current into radio waves

For this design, the most interesting piece was the small, white/clear, semi-opaque piece of plastic that was found at the corner of the device. It seems like a cap to close the case, but also to allow light to pass through. However, as this isn’t a device to actively turn on and therefore doesn’t need a light to indicate whether its on or off, AND the fact that I didn’t find a light/LED in the device, I wonder what the point of it is. It doesn’t add functional or aesthetic value… and yet it was included.


All in all, this was a great exercise, I enjoyed cracking these devices open and taking a look at what was inside. Looking forward to learning more about how all of the parts work together this week!

Exit mobile version